Introduction Terrorist acts are widely covered in the media, so lots so that questions arise as to whether or not the ample coverage is precisely what the terrorists want. The unspoken question here seems to be, does this sorting of media reporting encourage terrorist attacks? I also want to search another question, namely, if no one reported on the attacks, would they closure? I intend to discuss these questions and try to determine if, by covering terrorist attacks in depth, journalists are subconsciously fulfilling the terrorists' desires for publicity, attention and justification. communication theory and Terrorism Today Until fairly recently, communications were limited. But with the improvements in telecommunications, in particular satellites, and the spiral of the Internet, the world is suddenly much smaller. Now thither are “live broadcasts from anywhere on the globe†better-looking terrorists “the widest publicity for their spectacular violent acts†(Nacos, 1994). Nacos continues, “While international terrorists stop their violence primarily if not exclusively for publicity, media coverage is merely the means by which these perpetrators try to promote and realise their variant goals.
†However this can be questionned because Nacos bases this view on the assertion that terrorists do what they do for publicity. Although this seems questionnable as killing inncocent people and children sure can't just be for publicity and to be notices. It is thence we understand the correct meaning of terrorism. The FBI defines terrorism as "the nefarious use of force or violence against persons or holding to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (Flaherty, 2003). We tend to think of terrorists as young halfway Eastern men, but they are only part of the picture. In the U.K. the IRA is a terrorist group, and in the U.S. the KKK can legitimately be described as such a terrorist... If you want to amaze a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
†However this can be questionned because Nacos bases this view on the assertion that terrorists do what they do for publicity. Although this seems questionnable as killing inncocent people and children sure can't just be for publicity and to be notices. It is thence we understand the correct meaning of terrorism. The FBI defines terrorism as "the nefarious use of force or violence against persons or holding to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (Flaherty, 2003). We tend to think of terrorists as young halfway Eastern men, but they are only part of the picture. In the U.K. the IRA is a terrorist group, and in the U.S. the KKK can legitimately be described as such a terrorist... If you want to amaze a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment