In the United States, one consequence of the unravelling of the boom has been a fraying of the previous political consensus. The Ross Perot phenomenon during the first half of the 1992 election season was an indicator of the degree of disaffection, an indicator reinforced by the victory of other protest candidacies (e.g., Pat Buchanan, Jerry Brown in some(prenominal) established parties, candidacies that would previously have been relegated to the fringes. Throughout the 1980s, a buttoned-up republican agenda dominated national affairs, and the GOP fondly believed that all(prenominal) election would bring "realignment" in the form of a Republican
the eyes of landlubberly accountants.
13
On the contrary, however, it may be that technocrats promoted to unheardof levels of power could not brook opportunities previously not available to them. Certainly the oil boom was closely associated with the upward spiral of corruption, most conspicuously in the case of Diaz Serrano, the PEMEX Director General under Lopez Portillo, whose fall was a major feature of the de la Madrid anticorruption campaign.
the Mexican economy. During the years from 1960 through 1972, oil had accounted for a mere 3.8 percent of Mexican revenue domestic product. Between 1973 and 1984 that is, during the "oil boom," the proportion of Mexico's gross domestic product attributed to oil grew only to a chill outverymodest level of 5.4 percent.10
Those characteristics of navies specialized, highly ________
Baker, George. Mexico's Petroleum Sector. Tulsa: PennWell Books, 1984.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment