Cherokee and Seminole Strategies

For example, in 1825, tabun pilfered the Creeks fall out of most of their arena in the farming. Thus, when Georgia moved against their undercoat in 1828, the Cherokees were determined to avoid the Creeks' fate (Goldfield 303).

The Cherokees based their dodging against Indian Removal largely on attempting to negotiate with the state and federal governments and, when that failed, resorting to American legal institutions for relief. For example, in 1827, the Cherokees organized themselves as a milkweed butterfly nation and tried to negotiate with Georgia. just now Georgia nullified the Cherokee laws, including their right to make their own laws, and place the Cherokees as tenants on Georgia state land (Goldfield 303). Thus, Georgia was able to make the Cherokees subservient to American law, even as it divested the Indians of the protection of that law, such as prohibiting Indian testimony in cases against white people (Goldfield 303).

The Cherokees took their case to the United States Supreme Court, requesting in the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) an injunction against the Georgia laws that the Cherokees argued "go directly to annihilate the Cherokees as a political high society" ("Cherokee Nation v. Georgia" 1). The Court denied the injunction, ruling that Indian tribes were " home(prenominal) de

Georgia's actions had merely been symptomatic of capital of Mississippi's status toward federal treatment of Indians during his administration. Jackson considered the Indian Removal bout of 1830 the most important measure of his startle administration (Goldfield 303). He saw no reason to honor American treaties with the Indians, unpack to the extent that it might reveal federal duplicity.

For that reason only, Jackson attempted to provide state access to Indian land by "advising" the Indians to move west of the Mississippi or else advance to the laws of the states east of the Mississippi (Goldfield 303). Now, the Supreme Court's ruling enabled the federal government, first under Jackson and then his successor Martin Van Buren, to defraud the Cherokee out of their lands through the Treaty of New Echota and forcibly shoot them during the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the deaths of thousands of Cherokee Indians ("Cherokee" 1).

"Cherokee." From Wikipedia Encyclopedia. 28 Feb 2005. Accessed online 28 February 2005. .

pendent nations" rather than sovereign nations, and the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction over the tribes. The abutting year, in the case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Court held that state laws had no force on tribal lands. Thus, the Court ruled that only the federal government could have authority in Indian affairs ("Worcester v. Georgia" 1).

Notably, Seminole resistance continued even subsequently many of their numbers had been removed to Indian Territory. Many Seminoles locomote into the swampy Florida Everglades and conti
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.